Theories of Justice and Human Rights

A.Y. 2022/2023
6
Max ECTS
40
Overall hours
SSD
IUS/20
Language
English
Learning objectives
The course will be divided in two teaching units.
The first unit aims at introducing students to current theoretical discussions about human rights both at national level and at international level. It will analyze the concept of rights in general, consider different interpretation of the idea of human rights and their implications, and address the problem of the justification of human rights.
The second unit addresses a specific set of human rights, which is the right to emigrate and to migrate. This part of the course aims to analyze various aspects of migration rights, namely the right to exit and enter states, the right not to stay in receiving countries, the right to find refuge, and to gain citizenship.
Expected learning outcomes
At the end of the course students should have acquired:
- knowledge and understanding of the main positions in current theoretical discussions on human rights and migration;
- the capability to apply the acquired knowledge and understanding in order to take actively part in discussions about human rights and migration and to form individual judgements.
In order to exercise their learning, critical and communication skills, students will be required to read texts, to discuss them and to elaborate personal opinions.
Single course

This course cannot be attended as a single course. Please check our list of single courses to find the ones available for enrolment.

Course syllabus and organization

Single session

Responsible
Lesson period
Second trimester
Course syllabus
Unit 1

The first unit will introduce students to current theoretical discussions about human rights. After an introductory lesson describing what it means to address human rights from a theoretical perspective, the unit will consider the normative idea of human rights and its implications. Human rights being rights, the first objective will be to clarify the notion of a right. Once defined the general concept of rights, two interpretations of human rights will be considered. According to the first interpretation, human rights are pre-political rights individuals have independently of the existence of political institutions. According to the second interpretation, instead, human rights should be understood as rights against governments and, therefore, as presupposing the existence of political institutions. The two interpretations of human rights have different implications concerning responsibility for human rights' implementation. The second interpretation fits better with the contemporary understanding of human rights within international law. Assuming that interpretation, subsequent lessons will examine its implications as regards the implementation of human rights at the national level, considering how different governmental bodies can contribute to that task. Special attention will be paid to the specific problems raised by the implementation of socioeconomic rights. A lesson will be devoted to the constitutionalizing of human rights and to the role the judiciary may play in their implementation. The analysis of the apparent tension between judicial review of legislation and the democratic idea of popular sovereignty will set the floor for a discussion of the normative justification of human rights and of how human rights contribute to realize political equality. The last two lessons of the first unit of the course will tackle issues of human rights' implementation at the international level. Human rights' claim to universal validity will be discussed in the light of challenges describing human rights as an instrument of Western cultural imperialism. Finally, the extent of international responsibility for human rights will be considered, paying special attention to the challenge of global poverty to human rights.

Unit 1 will address the following topics:

- human rights from a theoretical perspective
- the general concept of rights
- concepts of human rights
- the status of beliefs about human rights
- the justification of human rights
- the implementation of human rights
- enforcing human rights through judicial review
- human rights' claim to universal validity
- international responsibility for human rights

Unit 2

The second unit of the course will tackle a specific set of rights, analysing a wide range of issues regarding migration, in the form of the ethics of movement and membership. The International Organization for Migration (IOM) estimates that in 2021 there were at least 281 million migrants worldwide (which are 3.6% of the population, as of 2020), in addition to the uncounted hundreds and thousands of people who cross borders irregularly each year. The UN Migration Agency defines a migrant as any person who is moving or has moved across an international border or within a State away from their habitual place of residence, regardless of (1) their legal status, (2) whether the movement is voluntary or involuntary, (3) what the causes for the movement are, and (4) what the length of the stay is. The teaching unit will address specifically each of these four points and will alternate reflections upon definitory questions (e.g., what are refugees? What is internal displacement? What is environmental migration? etc.) and questions that are more normative in core (e.g., should states share responsibility for the reception of refugee? Is it legitimate to restrict emigration rights to highly qualified workers? How should the international refugee regime be improved?). The issue of migration will be addressed from different angles, going beyond the classic open v. closed borders debates, by discussing different types of questions: from the scope of the right to freedom of movement, whether there is a human right to immigrate, and whether it might be considered legitimate to restrict emigration in the forms of brain drain and care drain. It will critically examine criteria for selecting between would-be immigrants (e.g., merit, lottery, using an algorithm), and for acquiring citizenship, as well as the tensions between the claims of prospective immigrants and existing residents. The lessons will tackle questions of migrant worker exploitation, and responsibility and duties for refugees, as well as considerations about the structural injustice that characterises refugeehood and asylum, and the harms of internal displacement.

Unit 2 will address the following topics:

- Closed v. Open Borders
- human rights to emigrate and immigrate
- reflections upon the legitimacy to restrict emigration
- criteria for selecting would-be immigrants and for acquiring citizenship
- temporary migration programs and the exploitation of migrant workers
- voluntary and forced migration
- refugees: definitions and responsibility for reception
- unjust borders and structural injustice in the global refugee regime
- environmental migration
Prerequisites for admission
No preliminary knowledge is required.
Teaching methods
For attending students, learning will be promoted through lectures, discussion, and individual reading of assigned material.
Attending-students will be required to write a position paper (1500/2000 words long) defending their personal position on a topic chosen from a list of topics provided by the teacher.
Non-attending student should prepare for the exam through the individual reading of assigned material.
Teaching Resources
Unit 1

The lessons of Unit 1 will be largely based on the following textbook:

- A. Facchi, S. Falcetta, N. Riva, An Introduction to Fundamental Rights in Europe: History, Theory, Cases, Edward Elgar, 2022.

In addition, attending students are required to read the following texts:

- J. Griffin, "First Steps in an Account of Human Rights", European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 9, n. 3, 2001, pp. 306-327.
- T. Pogge, "How Should Human Rights Be Conceived?", in T. Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights, 2nd edn, Polity Press, 2008, pp. 58-76.
- M.C. Nussbaum, "Capabilities and Human Rights", Fordham Law Review, vol. 66, n. 2, 1997, pp. 273-300.
- R. Dworkin, "Taking Rights Seriously" and "What Rights Do We Have?", in R. Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard University Press, 1977, pp. 184-205 and 266-278.
- L. Ferrajoli, "Fundamental Rights", International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, vol. 14, 2001, pp. 1-33.
- J. Waldron, "Judicial Review and the Conditions of Democracy", Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 6, n. 4, 1998, pp. 335-355.
- M.C. Nussbaum, "In Defense of Universal Values", in M.C. Nussbaum, Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge University Press, 2000, §§ 1-2, pp. 34-59.
- "Symposium: World Poverty and Human Rights", Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 19, n. 1, 2005, pp. 1-83.

For Unit 1, non-attending students are required to read only the following two texts:

- J. Griffin, On Human Rights, Oxford University Press, 2008.
- T. Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights, 2nd edn., Polity Press, 2008.

Unit 2

Attending students are required to read the following texts:

- L. Ypi, S. Fine, (2016), Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership, Oxford University Press, 2016, chapters 2, 3, 5, 9, 10, 13.
- J. Carens, "Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders", The Review of Politics, vol. 49, n. 2, 1987, pp. 251-273.
- D. Miller, "Immigration: The Case for Limits", in A. Cohen, C.H. Wellman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics, Blackwell, 2014, pp. 364-375.
- K. Oberman, "Can Brain Drain Justify Immigration Restrictions?", Ethics, vol. 123, n. 3, 2013, pp. 427-455.
- P.T. Lenard, "Restricting Emigration for Their Protection? Exit Controls and the Protection of (Women) Migrant Workers", Migration Studies, vol. 10, n. 3, 2022, pp. 510-527 [you can also see the related discussion at https://migrationpolicycentre.eu/projects/dilemmas-project/#].
- V. Ottonelli, T. Torresi, "When is Migration Voluntary?", International Migration Review, vol. 47, n. 4, 2013, pp. 783-813.
- V. Ottonelli, T. Torresi, "Temporary Migration Projects" in V. Ottonelli, T. Torresi, The Right not to Stay, Oxford University Press, 2022, pp. 15-42.
- A.E. Schacknove, "Who Is a Refugee?", Ethics, vol. 95, n. 2, 1985, pp. 274-284.
- D. Owen, "Differentiating Refugees: Asylum, Sanctuary, and Refuge", in D. Miller, C. Straehle (eds.), The Political Philosophy of Refuge, Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 19-38.
- S. Parekh, "Structural Injustice" in S. Parekh, No Refuge: Ethics and the Global Refugee Crisis, Oxford University Press, 2020, pp. 151-176.
- J. Draper, "Climate Change and Displacement: Towards a Pluralist Approach", European Journal of Political Theory, 0:0, 2022, pp. 1-21.
- R. Buxton, "Reparative Justice for Climate Refugees", Philosophy, vol. 94, n. 2, 2019, pp. 193-219.

Non-attending students are required to read all the readings listed for attending students, plus:

- D. Miller, Strangers in our Midst: The Political Philosophy of Immigration, Harvard University Press, 2016.

All the readings are available either online in open access form or at the university libraries.
Assessment methods and Criteria
Assessment methods and criteria will be different for attending and non-attending students.
In order to be considered attending student, attendance of 3/5 of classes (at least 6 for each unit) is required. Attendance will be assessed, but students can miss up to two lessons without penalties.
For attending students, a provisional final assessment will be based on attendance, participation, a position paper and a written exam. Students not satisfied with the provisional assessment will have the opportunity to take a final colloquium to try to improve it.
For non-attending students, the final assessment will be based on a written exam on the assigned readings and on a mandatory final colloquium.
For further information about assessment methods and criteria, and guidelines to write the position paper, consult the document uploaded on the Ariel website of the course.
IUS/20 - PHILOSOPHY OF LAW - University credits: 6
Lessons: 40 hours
Professors: Riva Nicola, Zuccarelli Gloria
Educational website(s)
Professor(s)
Reception:
The professor meets with students weekly, on campus or online. To make an appointment, please contact the professor by email.
On-campus meetings will be held in the professor's office on the second floor of the building overlooking via Passione (room 206). Online meetings will be held through Microsoft Teams.