Interdisciplinary project

A.A. 2023/2024
6
Crediti massimi
48
Ore totali
SSD
BIO/11 ING-INF/05
Lingua
Inglese
Obiettivi formativi
Hands-on experience in bioinformatics and genomics data processing using real-world data and addressing real world scientific questions is essential for any future computational biologist. Likewise, a computational biologist needs to be able to interface between two rather different disciplines: computer science and (molecular) biology. For this reason, it is important that a computational biologist is capable to communicate applied methodologies and research findings in a clear and concise manner to audiences of diverse backgrounds, both in oral and written form. Indeed, apart from being able to present the own work in a clear manner, it is also important to correctly describe it (e.g., in form of research articles, technical reports, dissertations, oral presentations at conferences, etc.).
Therefore, one objective of the course is to accompany the students during their practical experience with a scientific project in an interdisciplinary environment and provide a platform to practice the verbal and written communication skills required for scientific work. The students shall be supported in learning to effectively communicate methodological details of their work and obtained (intermediate) results, as well as discuss about further improvements and ideas. Both oral presentations and short written summaries of their work will help the students to prepare for writing and orally defending their Master's theses in the best way, which can improve their final grade.
Ideally, this course is thought to accompany the scientific project that the participants are executing (or will be executing) for their Master's theses, so that (apart from the preparation of a few oral presentations and short written summaries, thought and organized to be then reusable for the Master's thesis and its presentation) no additional practical work is required. Feedback provided on oral presentations and written communications will help the student to improve the final quality of his/her Master's thesis and of its defense. [Note: for its characteristics and aims, this course can be well associated with the extension of the Master's thesis; in this case it provides only the assessment of the corresponding 6 CFU, without requiring any request to, and approval by, the Study Plan Committee.]
For participants who instead wish to work on a project other than their thesis work, small alternative projects (possibly as group work) will be available (or can be developed jointly) during the course.
Risultati apprendimento attesi
The objective of the course is to provide the scientific communication skills necessary for scientific work in an interdisciplinary environment, including both the verbal and the written communication of methodological details and obtained results of research projects, as well as the scientific discussion of possible research improvements.
Corso singolo

Questo insegnamento non può essere seguito come corso singolo. Puoi trovare gli insegnamenti disponibili consultando il catalogo corsi singoli.

Programma e organizzazione didattica

Edizione unica

Responsabile
Periodo
Primo semestre

Programma
The course is composed of the following parts:

1. Theoretical and practical aspects of verbal communication in form of scientific talks
· Types of scientific presentations and types of audiences
· Three phases: planning, practicing, presenting/delivering (including question & answer session)
· Scientific "story telling"
· Slide development (structure/organization, design/layout) and depth of content
· Examples of scientific and non-scientific talks of different purposes

2. Theoretical and practical aspects of written scientific communication
· Organization/structure of a scientific paper; purpose and content of individual sections
· Scientific writing style (important aspects; with some brief examples)
· References and correct citing, quoting and paraphrasing; caution to plagiarism
· Hints for designing appropriate scientific figures
· Scientific reading and good reading habits
· Thesis / dissertation writing

3. Theoretical and practical aspects of poster presentations
· Purpose and structure
· Hints for effective poster design and their presentation to a scientific audience

Discussion of positive and negative examples

4. Seminars with project presentations
· Scientific presentations by students
· Each presentation is followed by a scientific discussion (scientific questions & answers regarding the presented research project) and feedback session (quality of the presentation, slides, etc.)
Prerequisiti
Knowledge of any presentation tool, such as MS PowerPoint, LibreOffice Impress or LaTeX Beamer. Knowledge of any document preparation system, such as MS Word, LibreOffice Writer or LaTeX.
Metodi didattici
The assessment will consist of two parts: a scientific talk (50% of the final grade) and a short paper (50% of the final grade). While poster presentations are be discussed in the course, they are not part of the exam or final grade.

Final oral presentation (scientific talk)(Dublin descriptor DD1, DD2, DD3, DD4):
A final oral presentation (scientific talk) about an own scientific project (thesis project or other), including a short question and answer session after the talk.
Evaluation criteria:
1) Logical structure of the presentation
2) Clarity/explanations of the scientific content (e.g., used methods) and logical reasoning (e.g., interpretation of the results)
3) Clarity and quality of the slides (design, text, figures)
4) Completeness (all necessary elements mentioned/explained?) and timing

Final written report (short paper) (Dublin descriptor DD1, DD2, DD3, DD4)
A final written report (short paper, about 5-7 pages) about the own scientific project.
Evaluation criteria:
1) Logical structure of the paper (abstract, introduction, methods, results & discussion, conclusions, references)
2) Clarity/explanations of the scientific content (e.g., used methods) and logical reasoning (e.g., interpretation of the results)
3) Correctness of the scientific content and logical reasoning (e.g., conclusions drawn from the results)
4) Brevity/conciseness but also completeness of the descriptions/explanations
5) Bibliography and correct citation

IMPORTANT NOTE: plagiarism detection software will be applied!
Materiale di riferimento
Recommended articles (not required to pass the exam):

· Bourne. "Ten Simple Rules for Making Good Oral Presentations". PLoS Comput Biol 3(4):e77, 2007.
· Carey et al. "Ten simple rules for reading a scientific paper". PLoS Comput Biol 16(7):e1008032, 2020.
· Erren, Bourne. "Ten Simple Rules for a Good Poster Presentation". PLoS Comput Biol 3(5): e102, 2007.
· Foster et al. "Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP". Res Integrity and Peer Rev 4:11, 2019.
· Lortie. "Ten simple rules for short and swift presentations". PLoS Comput Biol 13(3):e1005373, 2017.
· Marai et al. "Ten simple rules to create biological network figures for communication". PLoS Comput Biol 15(9):e1007244, 2019.
· Medvedev. "Ten Simple Rules for writing algorithmic bioinformatics conference papers". PLoS Comput Biol 16(4):e1007742, 2020.
· Mensh, Kording. "Ten simple rules for structuring papers". PLoS Comput Biol 13(9):e1005619, 2017.
· Penders. "Ten simple rules for responsible referencing". PLoS Comput Biol 14(4):e1006036, 2018.
· Rougier et al. "Ten Simple Rules for Better Figures". PLoS Comput Biol 10(9):e1003833, 2014.
· Weinberger et al. "Ten Simple (Empirical) Rules for Writing Science". PLoS Comput Biol 11(4):e1004205, 2015.
· Zhang. "Ten Simple Rules for Writing Research Papers". PLoS Comput Biol 10(1):e1003453, 2014.
Modalità di verifica dell’apprendimento e criteri di valutazione
The assessment is based on the final presentation (correctness, clarity, etc.) and the project report (correctness, clarity, etc.).
BIO/11 - BIOLOGIA MOLECOLARE
ING-INF/05 - SISTEMI DI ELABORAZIONE DELLE INFORMAZIONI
Lectures: 48 ore
Docente: Piro Rosario Michael