Bioethics: Methods and Principles
A.Y. 2021/2022
Learning objectives
The issues of bioethics have become fundamental themes in the public discussion of Western societies in recent decades, to the extent that Stephen Toulmin, in a 1986 essay ("How Medicine Saved the Life of Ethics"), would have stated that the discussion of human life and care techniques would literally "save" the life of ethics, returning them a real and effective meaning and concreteness. Bioethics would and indeed have been able to bring ethics back to the centre of public attention. The learning objectives of the course are to develop knowledge and skills useful to find criteria to justify or critically evaluate the legitimacy of political and public decisions, institutions and practices concerning the most relevant moral issues raised in the bioethical field: neonatal ethics (abortion, medically assisted procreation, embryo testing), genetic engineering and cloning, life-and-death dilemma (euthanasia, assisted dying, organ donation and transplantation), animal and nature treatment, Artificial Intelligence.
Expected learning outcomes
The course aims at the following learning objectives:
- to understand the main issues and challenges in bioethics;
- to develop competence on the main theoretical perspectives and methodological criteria in bioethics;
- to improve knowledge and ability to develop argumentation skills on bioethical issues;
- to develop the ability to apply the knowledge and skills acquired to the analysis and discussion of disputes at the heart of public debate (in relation, for example, to end-of-life issues).
- to understand the main issues and challenges in bioethics;
- to develop competence on the main theoretical perspectives and methodological criteria in bioethics;
- to improve knowledge and ability to develop argumentation skills on bioethical issues;
- to develop the ability to apply the knowledge and skills acquired to the analysis and discussion of disputes at the heart of public debate (in relation, for example, to end-of-life issues).
Lesson period: First trimester
Assessment methods: Esame
Assessment result: voto verbalizzato in trentesimi
Single course
This course cannot be attended as a single course. Please check our list of single courses to find the ones available for enrolment.
Course syllabus and organization
Single session
Responsible
Lesson period
First trimester
TEACHING METHODS
More specific information on the delivery modes of training activities for academic year 2021/2022 will be provided over the coming months, based on the evolution ot the public health situation.
COURSE SYLLABUS (PROGRAM)
The program and reference material will remain unchanged.
LEARNING AND EVALUATION CRITERIA
The examination will take place in oral form using the Microsoft Teams platform or, where the context allows it, in the presence, always in oral form.
The exam, in particular, will be aimed at:
- ensure that the objectives in terms of knowledge and understanding are achieved;
- ascertain the ability to apply knowledge and understanding through the examination and commentary of cases presented in class;
- check the student's autonomy of judgment also through the analysis of cases discussed during the course;
- ascertain the mastery of the language of bioethics, and the ability to present topics in a clear and orderly manner.
More specific information on the delivery modes of training activities for academic year 2021/2022 will be provided over the coming months, based on the evolution ot the public health situation.
COURSE SYLLABUS (PROGRAM)
The program and reference material will remain unchanged.
LEARNING AND EVALUATION CRITERIA
The examination will take place in oral form using the Microsoft Teams platform or, where the context allows it, in the presence, always in oral form.
The exam, in particular, will be aimed at:
- ensure that the objectives in terms of knowledge and understanding are achieved;
- ascertain the ability to apply knowledge and understanding through the examination and commentary of cases presented in class;
- check the student's autonomy of judgment also through the analysis of cases discussed during the course;
- ascertain the mastery of the language of bioethics, and the ability to present topics in a clear and orderly manner.
Course syllabus
The course is organized along four main thematic lines: 1) a critical investigation of the origins of the discipline, an investigation aimed at tracing its genealogy, its fundamental questions, meaning, and major assumptions; 2) the course will address the study of the theoretical status of bioethics, through the examination and comparison between theoretical deontological positions/attitudes and consequential theoretical positions/attitudes, and the examination of the main conceptual dilemmas that bioethical disputes bring out: pluralism and disagreement, autonomy and responsibility, paternalism and antipaternalism. 3) Bioethics will be addressed, at the third level, from the point of view of the method: from the principle-based approach to the method of cases, through the analysis of the main fallacies, the course will try to define the boundaries of discipline, and to suggest the main criteria to justify argumentative claims in the bioethics field. The fourth line of argument refers to bioethics in the most proper and philosophical sense of applied ethics, namely practical: in this sense bioethics is applied to particular problems, and an attempt is made to establish what is right or necessary to do in relation to particular situations. The cases considered will specifically concern two bioethical topics, one classic - end-of-life dilemmas - and one more related to the latest generation of bioethics, namely artificial intelligence.
Prerequisites for admission
No prior knowledge is required to attend the course or to take the exam.
Teaching methods
Teaching will be provided according to a path of frontal lessons (part one), followed by (second part) group work, individual presentations, case analysis and seminary discussions. The teaching uses e-learning teaching materials on the Ariel platform (the material will be defined in detail later).
Teaching Resources
ATTENDANT Students:
- Reichlin M., "Fondamenti di bioetica", Il Mulino, Bologna, 2021 (cap. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7);
- Boden M. A., "Intelligenza artificiale", Il Mulino, Bologna, 2019 (cap. 1);
- Shanahan M., "La rivolta delle macchine. Che cos'è la singolarità tecnologica e quanto presto arriverà", Luiss University Press, Roma, 2018 (cap. 5, 6, 7).
NB: To the texts indicated will be added other articles that will be made available online, on the ARIEL page of the course.
NON ATTENDANTS Students:
- Reichlin M., "Fondamenti di bioetica", Il Mulino, Bologna, 2021;
- Boden M. A., "Intelligenza artificiale", Il Mulino, Bologna, 2019.
- Reichlin M., "Fondamenti di bioetica", Il Mulino, Bologna, 2021 (cap. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7);
- Boden M. A., "Intelligenza artificiale", Il Mulino, Bologna, 2019 (cap. 1);
- Shanahan M., "La rivolta delle macchine. Che cos'è la singolarità tecnologica e quanto presto arriverà", Luiss University Press, Roma, 2018 (cap. 5, 6, 7).
NB: To the texts indicated will be added other articles that will be made available online, on the ARIEL page of the course.
NON ATTENDANTS Students:
- Reichlin M., "Fondamenti di bioetica", Il Mulino, Bologna, 2021;
- Boden M. A., "Intelligenza artificiale", Il Mulino, Bologna, 2019.
Assessment methods and Criteria
The exam is intended to verify that the objectives of the course have been achieved, and will take place in two distinct phases:
- an oral final examination, which aims to verify that the student has learned the methods and principles of the course, and that he can express them clearly and accurately, using the correct terminology;
- a presentation in "class", with the aim of framing and describing new phenomena, or case studies agreed with the teacher.
- an oral final examination, which aims to verify that the student has learned the methods and principles of the course, and that he can express them clearly and accurately, using the correct terminology;
- a presentation in "class", with the aim of framing and describing new phenomena, or case studies agreed with the teacher.
Professor(s)