Philosophical Anthropology

A.Y. 2021/2022
9
Max ECTS
60
Overall hours
SSD
M-FIL/03
Language
Italian
Learning objectives
The course aims to provide students with theoretical and methodological tools enabling them to tackle contemporary philosophical debates in moral philosophy, with special reference to value theory, fondational and applied ethics, and to the anthropological basis of value judgments.
Expected learning outcomes
Knowledge and understanding
At the end of the course, the student
- have a thorough knowledge of the theoretical contribution of some of the major moral philosophers;
- have a critical and articulate knowledge of the secundary literature relevant to those philosophers, which have been object of analysis;
- have a critical understanding of the main ethical and axiological issues involved in the theoretical landscape of contemporary moral philosophy.

Ability to apply knowledge and understanding
At the end of the course, the student
- can apply the conceptual tools that she/he has acquired, in order to discuss and rework moral questions concerning meaning and orientation of her/his acts.
- can orient her/him-self in the philosophical landscape of contemporary moral debate.
- can read and soundly discuss primary and secondary philosophical literature.
Single course

This course cannot be attended as a single course. Please check our list of single courses to find the ones available for enrolment.

Course syllabus and organization

Single session

Responsible
Lesson period
First semester
More specific information on the delivery modes of training activities for academic year 2021 / 2022 will be provided over the coming months, based on the evolution of the public health situation.
Course syllabus
The Question of Moral Imagination

The course will address the problem of the functions of imagination, on a cognitive and moral level. In the first instance, the problem of the relationship between imagination and reality will be tackled, through an examination of the way in which imagination and concepts relate. This analysis will then lead to problematizing the relationship between imaginary and truth on the one hand, and imaginary and meaning on the other. On this basis, in the third part of the course, the question of what role the imagination plays in terms of our decisions in the moral field will open up.
Prerequisites for admission
The students are required to have a good acquaintance with the Western philosophical tradition, as it is provided by an Italian three-year philosophy degree. They are further required to be able to read English philosophical texts.
Teaching methods
Lectures
Debate and discussion
Teaching Resources
Readings and assignments for attending students
Assignments both for 6 and 9 ECTS exams:

· Sartre, J.-P., L'immaginario. Psicologia fenomenologica dell'immaginazione, Torino, Einaudi, 2007.
· Zhok, A., Rappresentazione e realtà. Psicologia fenomenologica dell'immaginario e degli atti rappresentativi, Mimesis, Milano, 2014.


Additional assignments for 9 ECTS exam:
One text to be chosen between:

· Sartre, J.P., L'immaginazione. Idee per una teoria delle emozioni, Milano, Bompiani, 2004
or
· Johnson, M., Moral Imagination. Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics, University of Chicago press, 1994.


Readings and assignments for non-attending students
Assignments both for 6 and 9 ECTS exams:

· Sartre, J.-P., L'immaginario. Psicologia fenomenologica dell'immaginazione, Torino, Einaudi, 2007.
· Zhok, A., Rappresentazione e realtà. Psicologia fenomenologica dell'immaginario e degli atti rappresentativi, Mimesis, Milano, 2014.

Additional assignments for 9 ECTS exam:

· Sartre, J.P., L'immaginazione. Idee per una teoria delle emozioni, Milano, Bompiani, 2004
· Johnson, M., Moral Imagination. Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics, University of Chicago press, 1994.
Assessment methods and Criteria
The exam consists of an oral test on the topics discussed over the course. The students that have not attended to the lectures will be required to study further texts, which are specified below. There is not any other difference in the way the exam is to be tackled between attending and not-attending students.
General criteria that contribute to the determination of the final marks are:
1) Accuracy of the answers (adequacy to the textual matter);
2) Ability to provide a synthesis of the main conceptual issues;
3) Comprehensiveness and richness of the answers;
4) Expressive quality (terminological property, fluency, accuracy)
5) Ability to select the salient aspects of each debate and to connect them in a critical framework.
Unita' didattica A
M-FIL/03 - MORAL PHILOSOPHY - University credits: 3
Lessons: 20 hours
Unita' didattica B
M-FIL/03 - MORAL PHILOSOPHY - University credits: 3
Lessons: 20 hours
Unita' didattica C
M-FIL/03 - MORAL PHILOSOPHY - University credits: 3
Lessons: 20 hours
Professor(s)